Combine external estimates with first-party relationships
Wealth information is often most useful for prioritizing research. A team might review constituents with an established relationship, recent engagement, giving history, a moderate or high capacity indicator, and no recent prospect review.
Segments should normally combine external intelligence with the nonprofit's own giving, volunteering, event, membership, program, and communications data. An external wealth score alone cannot answer whether the organization has a meaningful and appropriate relationship with the person.
Personalize respectfully without exposing private research
Insights may inform personal outreach, leadership-giving research, cultivation events, planned-giving education, sponsorship review, or a broader gift array. Donor-facing content should never reveal private research, imply that the nonprofit knows someone's net worth, or convert estimated capacity directly into an ask amount.
Appropriate outreach also depends on prior gifts, recency, relationship, program interest, campaign stage, solicitation history, existing pledges, staff knowledge, researcher verification, and fundraiser judgment.
Protect privacy, explain scores, and refresh old data
- Document the data source and permitted use
- Limit access to staff with a legitimate need
- Preserve the provider's actual score meaning
- Record screening and verification dates
- Set expiration or review dates
- Provide a correction and removal process
- Review vendor retention and export rules
- Apply legal and ethical fundraising standards
Capacity, employment, affiliations, property holdings, and household circumstances change. Old estimates should not be treated as permanently current or renamed as verified facts.